Urban Catalyst Funds Blog

Why Development Feasibility Belongs in Opportunity Zone Tract Selection

Written by Erik Hayden | Sep 16, 2026, 8:50:28 PM

San Jose’s proposed tracts illustrate the difference between meeting federal eligibility requirements and providing practical opportunities for investment or development.

California’s draft Opportunity Zone 2.0 map raises a policy question that extends beyond San Jose: When several census tracts meet the federal eligibility requirements, what additional factors should states consider before making their final selections?

Income and poverty data identify communities eligible for consideration. Those data do not indicate whether land is available, zoning permits additional development, parcels can be assembled, infrastructure is adequate or a project can obtain financing and regulatory approvals.

These practical conditions do not determine whether a community needs or deserves investment. They may, however, affect whether an Opportunity Zone designation results in qualifying investment activity during the designation period.

San Jose provides one case study. Fifteen of Santa Clara County’s 17 recommended tracts are located within the city. The number of recommended tracts may appear significant, but the number alone does not indicate what types of investment or community development could realistically occur within them.

This article discusses public policy and land-use considerations. It does not evaluate or recommend any security, fund, property or investment strategy. Opportunity Zone designation does not establish the merits, suitability or expected performance of any investment.

Eligibility Is the Starting Point

Under Opportunity Zones 2.0, a census tract in a metropolitan area such as San Jose generally qualifies for consideration if:

  • Its median family income is below 70% of the metropolitan area median family income; or
  • Its poverty rate is at least 20%, and its median family income does not exceed 125% of the metropolitan area median family income.

Meeting one of these tests makes a tract eligible for consideration. It does not guarantee that the tract will be selected or receive investment.

Governors may nominate no more than 25% of their states’ eligible low-income census tracts. California must therefore choose from a larger group of qualifying communities.

The state’s selection process may consider economic conditions, community priorities, local recommendations and other policy factors. Development feasibility is one additional consideration that may help officials evaluate what forms of activity a designation could support.

Sources: California Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development and IRS Revenue Procedure 2026-14.

Eligibility Does Not Establish Investment Merit

Opportunity Zone designation may permit certain qualifying investments to receive preferential federal tax treatment if all applicable statutory, regulatory and holding-period requirements are satisfied.

Designation does not:

  • Establish that an investment is appropriate for any person.
  • Indicate that a project is economically feasible.
  • Guarantee that a tract will receive investment.
  • Reduce or eliminate the business and real estate risks associated with a project.
  • Guarantee any tax outcome.
  • Provide liquidity or protect investors against loss.

The availability and value of any federal tax treatment depend on numerous requirements and an investor’s individual circumstances. Tax laws, regulations and interpretations may change.

California does not conform to the federal deferral and exclusion of capital gains invested in Qualified Opportunity Funds. Investors should consult independent legal and tax professionals before making decisions involving Opportunity Zones or Qualified Opportunity Funds.

Practical Conditions Within a Tract

Federal eligibility standards are intended to identify economically distressed communities. They are not a substitute for project-level due diligence or land-use analysis.

Factors that may affect activity within a designated tract include:

  • The availability and ownership of suitable land or commercial property.
  • Existing land uses and zoning restrictions.
  • The ability to assemble parcels.
  • Infrastructure availability and capacity.
  • Environmental or entitlement requirements.
  • Construction costs and financing conditions.
  • Local market demand.
  • The time required to obtain approvals and complete a project.

Even when these conditions appear favorable, a project may not proceed or may fail to meet its objectives. Real estate development involves substantial risks, including changes in market conditions, construction costs, interest rates, financing availability, regulations and demand.

What the Draft San Jose Map Illustrates

Several of San Jose’s recommended tracts appear to provide limited opportunities for ground-up multifamily development based on their current land uses, ownership patterns and zoning.

One recommended tract includes both San José State University and San Jose City Hall. Several recommended tracts in the Alum Rock area consist largely of established single-family neighborhoods.

Institutional ownership and existing development patterns in these locations may limit the number of sites available for additional multifamily housing. A complete assessment would require project-specific review, including title, zoning, environmental, infrastructure, financial and market analysis.

Limited potential for ground-up multifamily development does not mean that these communities are undeserving of designation or investment. It also does not mean that housing should be the only objective of Opportunity Zone policy.

Depending on applicable law and local conditions, Opportunity Zone capital may be used in connection with operating businesses, infrastructure, energy projects, rehabilitation of existing properties or other qualifying activities. Whether any particular activity qualifies or is economically viable depends on its specific facts.

Other eligible San Jose tracts appear to contain underutilized properties, transit access or zoning that may permit additional development. These characteristics do not guarantee that investment or development will occur. They are factors the state may consider when comparing eligible tracts.

Designation Does Not Guarantee Capital Deployment

The original Opportunity Zone program illustrates the difference between designation and reported investment activity.

A June 2026 Treasury analysis found that 77% of Opportunity Zones in the 50 states and Washington, D.C., had received reported qualified investment through tax year 2024. Approximately 23% had received no reported investment, while another 34% had received some reported investment but less than $1 million.

These figures have important limitations. They do not establish why a tract did or did not receive investment. They do not measure investment performance, project viability or community benefit. Treasury also identified limitations in the available tax data.

Accordingly, the figures should not be interpreted as evidence that any particular tract was selected correctly or incorrectly. They indicate only that designation has not resulted in the same level of reported investment activity across all tracts.

A designation permits qualifying activity under the program. Developers, businesses and investors must still identify opportunities, conduct due diligence, obtain approvals, arrange financing and satisfy applicable program requirements.

Source: U.S. Treasury Office of Tax Analysis, June 2026.

Factors States May Consider

No single formula can determine which eligible census tracts should receive Opportunity Zone designations. The circumstances and priorities of individual communities vary.

When comparing eligible tracts, states may consider questions such as:

1. What community needs have been identified?

Economic conditions, poverty, housing needs, infrastructure and local priorities may all be relevant.

2. What forms of qualifying activity might be possible?

Potential activity could include housing, operating businesses, infrastructure, rehabilitation or other uses, subject to applicable requirements.

3. Are properties or facilities available?

Ownership patterns and existing uses may affect the practical availability of sites.

4. Do zoning and local plans permit additional activity?

An Opportunity Zone designation does not override local land-use rules.

5. What barriers could prevent execution?

Infrastructure requirements, parcel assembly, environmental review, approvals, construction costs and financing conditions may affect feasibility.

6. What additional due diligence would be required?

Census-tract-level analysis cannot replace a complete evaluation of a specific property, business or investment.

Considering these questions does not require states to select only locations that are easiest to develop or expected to generate the greatest financial return. Such an approach could be inconsistent with the program’s focus on economically distressed communities.

Instead, feasibility analysis may provide additional context regarding the types of activity a designation could potentially support and the barriers that may remain.

Housing as One San Jose Consideration

San Jose has experienced limited housing supply relative to demand. That condition may support considering housing capacity as one factor in the tract-selection process.

An Opportunity Zone designation does not resolve the many obstacles to housing production. It does not change zoning, lower construction costs, ensure financing, accelerate approvals or guarantee that a housing project will be completed.

However, when the state compares eligible tracts, it may consider whether current land uses, zoning, transit access and infrastructure are consistent with local housing goals.

Housing capacity should be evaluated alongside economic need, community input, business-development potential, infrastructure priorities and other relevant considerations.

California’s Next Step

During the public-comment period, Urban Catalyst asked California to reconsider several recommended San Jose tracts and evaluate other eligible local tracts that may provide different opportunities for housing or other development.

California has said it will review public comments alongside demographic and socioeconomic indicators, local recommendations and other factors as it prepares its final nominations.

The state must now determine how to balance those considerations. A tract’s eligibility, development characteristics and community needs provide different types of information. None independently establishes what investment will occur or what benefits a designation will produce.

San Jose has 15 recommended tracts. Before finalizing those recommendations, California has an opportunity to evaluate whether the proposed selections appropriately reflect the city’s needs and the practical limitations within each tract.

 

 

Copyright © 2026 Urban Catalyst LLC. All Rights Reserved. THIS PRESENTATION  IS CONFIDENTIAL. THE ACCEPTANCE AND RETENTION OF THIS PRESENTATION BY THE RECIPIENT SHALL CONSTITUTE AN AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH BELOW.

THIS PRESENTATION IS CONFIDENTIAL. THE ACCEPTANCE AND RETENTION OF THIS PRESENTATION BY THE RECIPIENT SHALL CONSTITUTE AN AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH BELOW.

THIS PRESENTATION IS NEITHER AN OFFER TO SELL NOR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY SECURITIES. THE OFFERING AND SALE OF INTERESTS IN URBAN CATALYST OPPORTUNITY ZONE FUND II LLC, URBAN CATALYST INDUSTRIAL I, UC MULTIFAMILY EQUITY I LLC, AND/OR UC MULTIFAMILY EQUITY II, LLC (COLLECTIVELY THE “OFFERINGS”) IS BEING MADE ONLY BY DELIVERY OF OFFERINGS’ PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUMS (“PPMs”), CERTAIN ORGANIZATIONAL DOCUMENTS, SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENTS AND CERTAIN OTHER INFORMATION TO BE MADE AVAILABLE TO INVESTORS (“OPERATIVE DOCUMENTS”) BY THE OFFERINGS’ SPONSOR(S). This material must be read in conjunction with the Operative Documents in order to fully understand all of the implications and risks of the offering of securities to which the Operative Documents relate. Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Attorney General of the State of New York nor any other state securities regulator has approved or disapproved of any of the securities related to these Offerings, determined if the Operative Documents are truthful or complete or passed on or endorsed the merits of the offering. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. You may only invest in the Offerings if you are an accredited investor as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D.

​​An investment in one or more of the Offerings is speculative and involves substantial risks. You should purchase these securities only if you can afford a complete loss of your investment. See the section entitled “Risk Factors” of the relevant PPMs to read about the more significant risks you should consider before making an investment in any of the Offerings.

Offering Disclosure
The contents of this communication: (i) do not constitute an offer of securities or a solicitation of an offer to buy securities, (ii) offers can be made only by the relevant, confidential PPM, which is available upon request, (iii) do not and cannot replace the PPM and is qualified in its entirety by the PPM, and (iv) may not be relied upon in making an investment decision related to any investment offering by an issuer, or any affiliate, or partner thereof ("Issuer"). All potential investors must read the PPM related to their investment and no person may invest without acknowledging receipt and complete review of the relevant PPM. With respect to any “targeted” goals and performance levels outlined herein, these do not constitute a promise of performance, nor is there any assurance that the investment objectives of any program will be attained. All investments carry the risk of loss of some or all of the principal invested. These “targeted” factors are based upon reasonable assumptions more fully outlined in the Offering Documents/ PPM for the respective offering. Consult the PPM for investment conditions, risk factors, minimum requirements, fees and expenses and other pertinent information with respect to any investment.

These investment opportunities have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are being offered pursuant to an exemption therefrom and from applicable state securities laws. All offerings are intended only for accredited investors unless otherwise specified.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. All information is subject to change. You should always consult a tax professional prior to investing. Investment offerings and investment decisions may only be made on the basis of a confidential private placement memorandum issued by Issuer, or one of its partner/issuers. Issuer does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. Thank you for your cooperation.

Securities offered through JCC Capital Markets, LLC, a member of FINRA. Urban Catalyst and JCC Capital Markets are not affiliated companies. The information contained in this (presentation) is proprietary and strictly confidential. It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receiving it and should not be made available to any other person or entity without the written consent of Urban Catalyst. 

Real Estate Risk Disclosure:
There is no guarantee that any strategy will be successful or achieve investment objectives including, among other things, profits, distributions, tax benefits, exit strategy, etc.; Potential for property value loss – All real estate investments have the potential to lose value during the life of the investments; Change of tax status – The income stream and depreciation schedule for any investment property may affect the property owner’s income bracket and/or tax status. An unfavorable tax ruling may cancel deferral of capital gains and result in immediate tax liabilities; Potential for foreclosure – All financed real estate investments have potential for foreclosure; Illiquidity – These assets are commonly offered through private placement offerings and are illiquid securities. There is no secondary market for these investments. Reduction or Elimination of Monthly Cash Flow Distributions – Like any investment in real estate, if a property unexpectedly loses tenants or sustains substantial damage, there is potential for suspension of cash flow distributions; Impact of fees/expenses – Costs associated with the transaction may impact investors’ returns and may outweigh the tax benefits Stated tax benefits – Any stated tax benefits are not guaranteed and are subject to changes in the tax code. Speak to your tax professional prior to investing.

UCME DISCLOSURES:
This confidential presentation (this “Presentation”) is being furnished upon request and on a confidential basis to a limited number of sophisticated investors on a “one-on-one” basis for the purpose of providing certain information about UC Multifamily Equity II, LLC (the “Fund”). This Presentation is for informational and discussion purposes only and is not, and may not be, relied on in any manner as legal, tax, investment, accounting or other advice or as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to purchase any securities of the Fund. Any such offer or solicitation shall only be made pursuant to the final confidential private placement memorandum (as amended or supplemented from time to time, and including the subscription agreement attached thereto, the “Subscription Package”) and the Fund’s limited liability company agreement, which will be furnished to qualified investors on a confidential basis at their request and should be reviewed in connection with any consideration of an investment in the Fund. No person has been authorized to make any statement concerning the Fund other than as will be set forth in the Subscription Package and any representation or information not contained therein may not be relied upon. The information contained in this Presentation must be kept strictly confidential and may not be reproduced (in whole or in part) or redistributed in any format without the express written approval of Urban Catalyst Manager V LLC (the “Manager”). By accepting this document, the recipient agrees that it will, and will cause its representatives and advisors to, use the information only to evaluate its potential interest in the Fund and for no other purpose and will not, and will cause its representatives and advisors not to, divulge any such information to any other party. Neither the Fund nor any of its affiliates makes any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein and nothing contained herein should be relied upon as a promise or representation as to past or future performance of the Fund or any other entity. Any potential investor considering an investment in the Fund that is on behalf of an employee benefit plan or individual retirement account (or governmental, church, or foreign plan subject to laws similar to those governing employee benefit plans and individual retirement accounts) is strongly encouraged to consult with its own legal and tax advisers regarding the consequences of such an investment.

This Presentation does not constitute a part of the Subscription Package. An investment in the Fund is speculative, entails a high degree of risk, and no assurance can be given that the Fund’s investment objectives will be achieved or that investors will receive a return of their capital. In considering investment performance information contained in this Presentation, prospective investors should bear in mind that past, targeted or projected performance is not necessarily indicative of future results, and there can be no assurance that targeted or projected returns will be achieved, that the Fund will achieve comparable results or that the Fund will be able to implement its investment strategy or achieve its investment objectives. While the Manager’s projected returns are based on assumptions which the Manager believes are reasonable under the circumstances, the actual realized returns on the Manager’s unrealized investment will depend on, among other factors, the value of the asset and market conditions at the time of disposition, any related transaction costs and the timing and manner of sale, all of which may differ from the assumptions and circumstances on which the Manager’s projections are based. Accordingly, the actual realized returns on unrealized investments may differ materially from the Manager’s projected returns indicated herein. There can be no assurance that projected or expected realizations or distributions will occur. Furthermore, prospective investors are encouraged to contact the Manager’s representatives to discuss the procedures and methodologies used to calculate the investment returns and other information provided herein. Certain information contained herein constitutes “forward-looking statements,” which can be identified by the use of terms such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue,” “target” or “believe” (or the negatives thereof) or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. Due to various risks and uncertainties, such as those set forth in the Subscription Package, actual events or results or actual performance of the Fund may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. As a result, investors should not rely on such forward-looking statements in making their investment decisions.

NOTICE TO INVESTORS

There are substantial risks associated with the federal income tax aspects of an investment in the Company. The income tax consequences of an investment in the Company are complex and recent tax legislation has made substantial revisions to the Code. Many of these changes affect the tax benefits generally associated with an investment in real estate. A further discussion of the tax aspects (including other tax risks) of an investment in the Company is set forth in the PPM under “Federal Income Tax Consequences.” Because the tax aspects of the Offering are complex, and certain of the tax consequences may differ depending on individual tax circumstances, prospective investors are urged to consult with and rely on their own tax advisor concerning the Offering’s tax aspects and their individual situation. No representation or warranty of any kind is made with respect to the Internal Revenue Service’s (the “IRS’s”) acceptance of the treatment of any item by the Company or an investor.

It is anticipated that if the Company generates taxable income, such income will be considered UBTI. Tax-exempt entities should consult with their own tax counsel regarding the effect of any UBTI. See the PPM and “Federal Income Tax Consequences – Investment by Qualified Plans, IRAs and Tax-Exempt Entities – Unrelated Business Taxable Income.”

Congress has recently enacted several major tax bills that substantially affect the tax treatment of real estate investments including, but not limited to, the tax provisions of the CARES Act. These changes will have a substantial effect on the type of activities in which the Company intends to engage, and certain of those effects are set forth under the appropriate subheadings under “Federal Income Tax Consequences.” In many instances, Congressional Committee reports have been relied upon for the interpretation and application of these new statutory provisions. While the Code authorizes the Treasury Department to issue extensive substantive regulations regarding recently adopted Code provisions, few have been issued to date. In addition, Congress could make substantial changes in the future to the income tax consequences with respect to an investment in the Company.